WANTED
VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
Must have served as an elected official
Must be a “bull-dog” politician able to lie without blinking
Must be a WOMAN
Must be ATTRACTIVE
Must be a radical right wing religious fanatic
No others need apply
Education Requirements: 4-year degree - any subject
Foreign Affairs Requirements: None
Economic Requirements: None
Please submit full-length, pageant-quality, swimsuit photo with resume to:
The McCain First Campaign
PO Box - Keating 5
Anything to Win, America 10000
*Applications without attached photographs will be discarded
VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
Must have served as an elected official
Must be a “bull-dog” politician able to lie without blinking
Must be a WOMAN
Must be ATTRACTIVE
Must be a radical right wing religious fanatic
No others need apply
Education Requirements: 4-year degree - any subject
Foreign Affairs Requirements: None
Economic Requirements: None
Please submit full-length, pageant-quality, swimsuit photo with resume to:
The McCain First Campaign
PO Box - Keating 5
Anything to Win, America 10000
*Applications without attached photographs will be discarded
7 comments:
Ba, wa, fa, ma, we, an, be, tell John to stop picking on me about the billions of dollar of pork spending I was getting for Illinios.
Wanted:
President of the United States. Qualifications do not include foreign affairs experience, leadership experience, or independent thought. Prefer religious association with radical anti American and racist church. Any political experience garnered from corrupt organizations will be overlooked. Preferred voting record should include tax increases, anti second amendment, or simply a "present" vote. Muslim background preferred, as the position should be "globally minded". Applicant should be willing to "change" the system to something different, no matter what that may be; just different. Any application not compliant to the last letter will be thrown out.
There is nothing more sad than a sore loser.
Maybe you won't screw up your nomination process in 2012. Stay away from the loose cannon-moron ticket next time.
Nothing worse than a sore loser? Not a topic you should bring up. As I recall, your party has been the sorest losers of all time. Hanging chads, voter fraud allegations, strong arm tactics, dead people voting, vote recounts, etc.
Heck you guys were even at each others throats in Vegas this year at the Primary about cheating. At least you're consistent in losing in that you'll claim you didn't lose because the other guy cheated.
It's inconceivable in the Dems eyes that it's possible that a majority of the people don't agree with your views. Maybe just maybe, more people are actually Republicans.
When Clinton won, there were no lawsuits, no allegations of cheating, just a concession of defeat by the Republicans and they moved on.
It's more of the liberal rhetoric that gets whipped up by the talking heads on TV, and then becomes adopted as gospel by the liberal masses.
You again helped to contrast libs vs. Republicans.
We might seek to explain events based on what we call "facts". We define these "facts" based on things that actually happened. "Facts" as we define them, are empirically found; but get this, can change as knowledge becomes available.
Republicans seem to believe that facts are born only by your words. Some idea does not become fact if you repeat it enough times. The republican style of governing with respect to your definition of fact explains the failed leadership of republican administrations.
Lying, bitter, angry, self-possessed failures. The public is beginning to see this, and have had enough of the failures you choose as leaders.
Sounds like you read Angela McGlowan's book Bamboozled. Only you switch the word Republican with Democrat.
You echo her whole point in the book(and with lots of footnotes of supporting material). Except that the DEMOCRATS, not the Republicans, have repeated lies about their policies and how they are for the everyday guy.
Case in point. Senator Bird, before he died, was somehow the ranking member in Congress for the Democrats; even though he was a Clansman. Don't they hate blacks? Why would the Democrats be the party for blacks with a Clansman at the helm? Because they say they are for blacks, therefore they must be.
She goes on to say that eventually what happens is that the mantra becomes second nature and the masses regurgitate the lies and perpetuate it to "truth". Free marketing if you will.
Looks like you're using the same tactic and claiming it's the Republicans doing that bamboozling. Nice try.
I'll trust an Ivy Leaguer with supporting evidence of the Democratic inconsistencies over you.
Welcome to right wing nut job book report, with "special" guest Bdog!
Post a Comment